Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case law at both the federal and state levels.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees implement.
However, decisions rendered because of the Supreme Court of the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues from the Constitution and federal legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son instructed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load provided to any reported judgment might depend on the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]
Because of this, simply citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling anyone to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-such neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving within the neighborhood endeavoring to find their phone is probably going to become more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, it is also a nicely-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold read more inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination for the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity from the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the distinct negation with the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels. When this form of law strives to form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.
Criminal cases Within the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil law systems, common legislation systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.